Residential solar is about to hit a turning point. If your pitch depends on tax credits and traditional purchases, the game has changed.
PPAs and leases are what keep your pipeline healthy after the 2025 incentive changes. A PPA (power purchase agreement) is simply a setup where a homeowner doesn’t buy the solar system, they just buy the electricity it produces at an agreed rate.
The upside: they’re easier to sell, especially over the phone, if you tighten your process.
In this post, I’ll walk through:
Here’s the basic reality:
If your entire value story is “30% off with the credit,” that story expires on a specific date.
PPAs and leases sidestep that problem. The homeowner doesn’t buy the system. They:
You’re not selling an asset. You’re swapping where their power comes from and what they pay for it.
Most homeowners don’t wake up thinking, “I want to own solar equipment.”
They’re tired of:
With a traditional purchase, the pitch is:
With a PPA or lease, the pitch becomes:
The core message:
“You keep paying for power like you do today, but at a lower and more predictable rate.”
That matches how people already think: “I pay a bill, I get power.”
The strongest teams are shifting from doors to virtual.
One model that’s working:
They treat the phone like a digital canvassing:
Operationally:
This isn’t about a “magic opener.” It’s about a clean process you can run at scale.
Cold calls have one built-in problem: people say no before they understand what you’re offering.
Most beginners lead with “solar” and get shut down.
Top teams:
Example structure:
“Hey [Name], this is [Rep] with [Company]. We’re working on an energy program for [Utility Company] customers to reduce their electric bill. Have you noticed your bill climbing over the last couple of years?”
The first 20–30 seconds are not for explaining the program. Your only job is to:
Once they admit the bill is a problem, they’re ready for a solution.
Most beginners miss this part.
If you jump into panels, kilowatts, and hardware, you lose people.
Instead, sell the problem:
Then use a simple alignment question:
“If there was a way to lock in a cheaper rate than [Utility Company] with a clear path for the next 20–25 years, would you at least want to see the numbers?”
Now you can position the PPA:
One line that consistently lands:
“What’s more important to you, where your power comes from, or how much you pay for it?”
Most people choose price and predictability. That’s exactly what PPAs and leases are built to deliver.
PPAs aren’t experimental.
Big buyers already do this:
They sign long-term power purchase agreements because they want a known price path.
You can anchor to that:
It moves the conversation from “weird solar contract” to a normal way big players buy power.
Stop arguing with objections. Agree, then redirect.
“I don’t want to buy solar panels.”
“You’re right. That’s exactly why this program exists. It’s for people who want cheaper electricity without owning panels.”
“Buying solar is expensive.”
“Totally fair. A full purchase is a big investment. This is different, you’re not buying a system, you’re just paying for electricity.”
“I’m worried about selling my house later.”
“That’s a smart thing to worry about. That’s why we only use providers with clear written transfer rules. We’ll go through that part before you decide.”
Agreement lowers tension. It makes the PPA feel like their idea, not your push.
The escalator clause (often 2.9% per year) is where a lot of reps get nervous. They mumble it and hope the homeowner moves on.
That’s how you create cancellations.
Instead, bring it forward:
Then connect it to reality:
With the PPA, the homeowner gets a written path for 20–25 years instead of guesswork.
Language that works:
You’re not promising the lowest number in every scenario; you’re selling clarity.
Don’t let “rate envy” between states derail you.
In some markets, PPA rates are ultra-low because:
In other markets, those extras don’t exist, so rates are naturally higher.
Simple explanation:
“In some states, the program includes extra incentives in the rate. In your state, those aren’t available, so the numbers won’t match those ads. The rate I’m showing you already includes everything; there’s no extra incentive paperwork for you.”
On labels:
Functionally, the homeowner is still:
The important part: price, escalator, and transfer language, not the label.
This is where a lot of bad solar stories start.
When transfers go wrong, it’s usually because:
You avoid this by doing your homework:
If you want repeat business from agents, this is where you earn it.
Not all PPAs and leases are created equal.
Some providers:
Others:
Simple rule: pick the product you’d want on your own house.
Practical moves:
On credit and DTI, set expectations early:
A five-minute honest conversation here can save you a blow-up three years from now.
PPAs and leases are easier to train on because the story is cleaner.
Standardize these points:
Script-friendly lines:
The market is shifting whether you adjust or not.
PPAs and leases are not a step backward, they’re a direct answer to what most homeowners actually want:
If you:
…you’ll be ready for the post-incentive world while other teams are scrambling.
Your next three moves:
Clarity wins.
Keep the first minute light and easy, sell the problem hard, then show a simple plan that gives their electric bill a future they can actually see.
If you want more live scripts, real call breakdowns, and a deeper dive on contracts and transfers, sign up for the Solar Masterclass. We’ll walk through the exact virtual systems, word-for-word frameworks, and provider checklists you can plug into your team right away.